PSA: Yeah, if you are CIA or the like reading this, and you think I should take this post down for national security purposes, just let me know guys...
So, there are no videos of him in casinos, or toting equipment in the elevators, or anything. A high roller at the casinos would have tons of video footage from security in Vegas.
So, his profile is almost certainly bogus for some reason. Perhaps it is a national security issue, given the seeming incompetence of the response teams and the absolute nonsense from the media sources, and the strange FBI denunciation of the ISIS responsibility claim.
His death photos look real enough to me. So...
My assumption is that he was an undercover CIA operative who's job it was to foil terrorist plots. ISIS thinks he is one of them, or a "convert," but the operation got fucked up, they "made" him, and killed him after the terrorist attack.
So, in conclusion, my guess was that the CIA or some related agency was responsible for foiling a terrorist plot, but they got "made" and fucked up the operation.
I would doubt the feasibility of the political climate of some black ops agency taking the fall for getting 59 people killed, so they cannot admit to some operation like this.
The problem is that any data is hackable if it is on a computer, and no information is safe, so it will get out, fortunately or unfortunately.
So, there are no videos of him in casinos, or toting equipment in the elevators, or anything. A high roller at the casinos would have tons of video footage from security in Vegas.
So, his profile is almost certainly bogus for some reason. Perhaps it is a national security issue, given the seeming incompetence of the response teams and the absolute nonsense from the media sources, and the strange FBI denunciation of the ISIS responsibility claim.
His death photos look real enough to me. So...
My assumption is that he was an undercover CIA operative who's job it was to foil terrorist plots. ISIS thinks he is one of them, or a "convert," but the operation got fucked up, they "made" him, and killed him after the terrorist attack.
So, in conclusion, my guess was that the CIA or some related agency was responsible for foiling a terrorist plot, but they got "made" and fucked up the operation.
I would doubt the feasibility of the political climate of some black ops agency taking the fall for getting 59 people killed, so they cannot admit to some operation like this.
The problem is that any data is hackable if it is on a computer, and no information is safe, so it will get out, fortunately or unfortunately.
No comments:
Post a Comment