Crucial Evidence: Vegas Shooting Brother Interview

This guy is legit.  His body language is spot on, and he is not lying.

He establishes that the brother was a high roller, a professional gambler, and that everyone at the hotels and casinos knew him.  Problem: there is no video footage of Stephen anywhere gambling.  Do a search and prove me wrong.

This, my friends is impossible.  If you gamble in Vegas, there are tons of footage of your every move.

This piece of the puzzle is the most crucial at this point in establishing many enormously important points.  

Now, we will walk through some Logic-Tight if-then-else type statements that establishes a few shocking conclusions.

• If there is no video footage of Stephen Paddock, then, Stephen Paddock was never in Vegas.  Think clearly about that point.  It is an indisputable syllogism.
• If Stephen Paddock was in Vegas, and there is no video footage of him at the casinos, then someone must have removed these videos.

Exhibits

There is no YouTube video footage of Stephen Paddock at any casinos other than alleged surveillance footage back in 2011:

There are only two possible conclusions from this:

• Stephen Paddock was never in a Vegas casino since 2011
• YouTube and Google removed all videos of Paddock since 2011 within casinos

Both of these conclusions are air-tight with logic consistently applied to what we know for sure.

Thus, taking each conclusion to its logical limit, we will discuss the implications of both conclusions.

Conclusion 1: Stephen Paddock was never in a Vegas casino since 2011

Implications:

• investigators are lying
• investigators are covering up evidence for some unknown reason
• investigators are being fed false evidence and false information
• investigators are being told to lie for national security reasons

Conclusion 2: YouTube and Google removed all videos of Paddock since 2011 within casinos

Implications:

• Someone at Google and YouTube removed the videos of Stephen Paddock
• The person removing the videos did so under two scenarios:
• He was ordered to remove the videos by management
• He hacked the system and destroyed the videos

So, the above points are not disputable.  Try if you will.